Insurance 'could pay for long-term care'

Tuesday, 14 July 2009 04:00

A £20,000 ‘insurance policy’ could end the “cruel lottery” of long-term health care, the government has said in its green paper.

Health secretary Andy Burnham presented three potential models to reform the health care system for the elderly to Parliament this afternoon.

The current system is seen by many as unfair, with elderly people sometimes forced to sell their homes to pay for care.

“We need a care system that people can rely on, that doesn’t penalise their prudence, and ends the cruel lottery that punishes people who have dementia, as opposed to, for example, cancer.”

Under current rules, anyone who has more than £23,000 in assets receives no state help if they have to move into a nursing home.

Mr Burnham said the report rejected models where the state pays all the costs, or where the individual pays all the costs and presented three funding models.

The first is a partnership model, where the government will offer to pay either a third or half of all the healthcare costs, with the proportion depending on the ability of the patient to pay. This would cost the patient between £20,000 to 25,000, the government predicts.

The other two models are based on an insurance policy – either a voluntary payment, or a compulsory payment.

Under the voluntary model, people can expect to pay around £20,000 to 25,000 and under the compulsory model, between £17,000 to 20,000.

This could be paid in a lump sum, through instalments or taken from an individual’s pension, ministers said.

Responding to the paper, shadow health secretary Andrew Lansley said: “We need serious costed proposals.”

Demand for long-term care is also set to rise as longevity increases, putting more pressure on funding.

However, the proposal to use insurance as a way of funding the system is likely to be unpopular, according to a survey from Saga.

Only 21 per cent of those surveyed preferred an insurance policy approach, while the alternative strategy of a one-off payment at retirement or death to pay for care was only supported by six per cent.

Emma Soames, editor-at-large of Saga Magazine, said: “The current system for the provision of care and support is widely accepted as being outdated and in many cases grossly unfair.

“Saga’s research, however, clearly shows that the funding proposals debated so far are receiving a decidedly cool reception amongst over 50s.”

Comments Bubble Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus

Twitter: My Finances

Join the conversation at #news_myfinances

Newsletter sign up


In addition to the weekly newsletter, which areas of finance would you like to hear from us about:

Tick this box if you would like us to send you promotions from carefully selected third parties.

By signing-up you agree to the terms of use and privacy policy.

sign-up button

Get the latest information on: